collapse

Resources

Recent Posts

Let's talk about the transfer portal... by Galway Eagle
[Today at 11:39:42 AM]


WWE @ MSG by withoutbias
[Today at 11:38:13 AM]


Fans by wisblue
[Today at 11:32:29 AM]


Ben Gold by wadesworld
[Today at 11:15:37 AM]


Rebounding by muwarrior69
[Today at 10:58:14 AM]


Next 3 Games UC,STJ,CR by GoldenEagles03
[Today at 10:55:48 AM]


2024-25 Big East Poll Rankings, NET Rankings and Team Sheets by MarquetteMike1977
[Today at 10:35:49 AM]

Please Register - It's FREE!

The absolute only thing required for this FREE registration is a valid e-mail address. We keep all your information confidential and will NEVER give or sell it to anyone else.
Login to get rid of this box (and ads) , or signup NOW!


pbiflyer

https://www.science.org/content/article/infamous-paper-popularized-unproven-covid-19-treatment-fA 2020 paper that sparked widespread enthusiasm for hydroxychloroquine as a COVID-19 treatment was retracted today, following years of campaigning by scientists who alleged the research contained major scientific flaws and may have breached ethics regulations. The paper was pulled because of ethical concerns and methodological problems, according to a retraction notice.

The paper in the International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents (IJAA), led by Philippe Gautret of the Hospital Institute of Marseille Mediterranean Infection (IHU), claimed that treatment with hydroxychloroquine, an antimalarial drug, reduced virus levels in samples from COVID-19 patients, and that the drug was even more effective if used alongside the antibiotic azithromycin. Then–IHU Director Didier Raoult, the paper's senior author, enthused about the promise of the drug on social media and TV, leading to a wave of hype, including from then–U.S. President Donald Trump.

But scientists immediately raised concerns about the paper, noting the sample size of only 36 patients and the unusually short peer-review time: The paper was submitted on 16 March 2020 and published 4 days later. On 24 March, scientific integrity consultant Elisabeth Bik noted on her blog that six patients who were treated with hydroxychloroquine had been dropped from the study—one of whom had died, and three of whom had transferred to intensive care—which potentially skewed the results in the drug's favor. Larger, more rigorous trials carried out later in 2020 showed hydroxychloroquine did not benefit COVID-19 patients.inally-retracted

tower912

Luke 6:45   ...A good man produces goodness from the good in his heart; an evil man produces evil out of his store of evil.   Each man speaks from his heart's abundance...

It is better to be fearless and cheerful than cheerless and fearful.

wadesworld


Shaka Shart

Reported for politics. My getting preventively sick and spreading it to you is none of your business
"Would that put a smile on your face and a boner in your pants?" - Brewcity77

Re: Quit Whining

January 9, 2017, 07:26:20 AM

Skatastrophy

Quote from: 4 Falling Turds on December 17, 2024, 04:06:56 PMReported for politics. My getting preventively sick and spreading it to you is none of your business
The definition of politics is a topic where I get angry when someone calls my opinion ignorant.

Shaka Shart

"Would that put a smile on your face and a boner in your pants?" - Brewcity77

Re: Quit Whining

January 9, 2017, 07:26:20 AM

jesmu84


Shaka Shart

Quote from: jesmu84 on December 17, 2024, 08:32:20 PMIs this the report rocket routinely referenced?

I'd say yes but also referencing an actual medical paper seems also too coherent 
"Would that put a smile on your face and a boner in your pants?" - Brewcity77

Re: Quit Whining

January 9, 2017, 07:26:20 AM

Previous topic - Next topic