collapse

* '23-'24 SOTG Tally


2023-24 Season SoG Tally
Kolek11
Ighodaro6
Jones, K.6
Mitchell2
Jones, S.1
Joplin1

'22-23
'21-22 * '20-21 * '19-20
'18-19 * '17-18 * '16-17
'15-16 * '14-15 * '13-14
'12-13 * '11-12 * '10-11

* Big East Standings

* Recent Posts

NIL Future by PointWarrior
[Today at 08:07:42 PM]


MU Alumni playing in European and Foreign Leagues Thread by Herman Cain
[Today at 07:45:48 PM]


Starting line ups/rotations 24-25 by PGsHeroes32
[Today at 06:53:07 PM]


Big East 2024 -25 Results by Herman Cain
[Today at 06:05:27 PM]


Shaka interview by Skatastrophy
[Today at 05:01:17 PM]


TK/Oso Summer League by MU82
[Today at 12:31:28 PM]


Excellent Mr Dodds Interview with Ben Gold by Herman Cain
[Today at 08:52:59 AM]

Please Register - It's FREE!

The absolute only thing required for this FREE registration is a valid e-mail address.  We keep all your information confidential and will NEVER give or sell it to anyone else.
Login to get rid of this box (and ads) , or register NOW!

* Next up: B&G Scrimmage

Marquette
Marquette

B&G Scrimmage

Date/Time: Oct 5, 2024 11:00am
TV: NA
Schedule for 2023-24
27-10

Author Topic: More conference realignment talk  (Read 469949 times)

The Hippie Satan of Hyperbole

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 12588
  • “Good lord, you are an idiot.” - real chili 83
Re: More conference realignment talk
« Reply #3575 on: September 12, 2024, 12:27:20 PM »
It's too bad that Cal and Stanford jumped ship when they did, because this (see below) would easily be a top 6 hoops conference and roughly comparable to the ACC in football, with at least some semblance of geographical unity:

Cal
Stanford
Washington St
Oregon St
Boise St
Colorado St
Fresno St
SDSU
SMU
Tulane

Pat Forde alludes to Cal and Stanford knowing this was a possibility but wanting no part of it.  They're making more in the ACC and its a better institutional fit.
“True patriotism hates injustice in its own land more than anywhere else.” - Clarence Darrow

Nukem2

  • Registered User
  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 5048
Re: More conference realignment talk
« Reply #3576 on: September 12, 2024, 01:38:48 PM »
They could go after Utah St. and North Dakota St. and rename the league “PAC St.”.

MUeng

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 668
Re: More conference realignment talk
« Reply #3577 on: September 12, 2024, 02:26:18 PM »

Yeah, they didn't merge because you now don't have to share with Utah State and Hawaii.

And that Wolken article is terrible. What else were OSU and WSU supposed to do?
I thought the article was pretty good actually. Sure osu and wsu are now irrelevant and have battered egos since being left without a chair, but it drives home the point that all major realignment has been done to caress egos.  I agree osu and wsu basically had to do this, but they probably also think they deserve a shot at playoff glory in this new conference when in reality they don't.

The Hippie Satan of Hyperbole

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 12588
  • “Good lord, you are an idiot.” - real chili 83
Re: More conference realignment talk
« Reply #3578 on: September 12, 2024, 03:26:59 PM »
I thought the article was pretty good actually. Sure osu and wsu are now irrelevant and have battered egos since being left without a chair, but it drives home the point that all major realignment has been done to caress egos.  I agree osu and wsu basically had to do this, but they probably also think they deserve a shot at playoff glory in this new conference when in reality they don't.


But the bolded isn't true. Almost every decision to leave conferences or jump to another is about generating more revenue in the short or long term - which Wolken calls a "Ponzi Scheme." (Which it definitely isn't by the way. Does he even know what a Ponzi Scheme is?)  OSU and WSU know what they are doing here. It is doubtful that they are just making guesses about what their next contract would look like - they very likely had pretty solid estimates when making presentations to the four schools leaving. The fact that Wolken thinks this is about vibes, feels and egos just means he doesn't have access to the information that the schools certainly have.

But let's also look at another quote from this article:

"Why did Southern Cal engineer a jailbreak from the Pac-12 for the Big Ten? Because their program had been in stasis and there was a perception among USC administrators that the Pac-12 wasn’t doing enough to help them get back to national relevance."

Well, he's right about that. The Pac-12 was poorly managed for a long time. Turned down a media deal that they should have taken. Yet USC and UCLA stuck with the Pac 12 until it was obvious that the B10 was going to be significantly more lucrative for them. So they left. Same story with Texas and Oklahoma and the SEC.

This is about money. And you can't blame schools for making more money considering the resource challenges that many will have moving foward.
“True patriotism hates injustice in its own land more than anywhere else.” - Clarence Darrow

brewcity77

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 26654
  • Warning-This poster may trigger thin skinned users
    • Cracked Sidewalks
Re: More conference realignment talk
« Reply #3579 on: September 12, 2024, 03:38:13 PM »
They could go after Utah St. and North Dakota St. and rename the league “PAC St.”.

I endorse this suggestion  ;D
This space reserved for a 2024 2025 National Championship celebration banner.

The Hippie Satan of Hyperbole

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 12588
  • “Good lord, you are an idiot.” - real chili 83
Re: More conference realignment talk
« Reply #3580 on: September 13, 2024, 02:15:10 PM »
I saw a couple things today saying that it is unlikely that any FCS schools would make the jump to join the Mountain West since FCS to FBS now requires a school to pay the NCAA $5 million.

So unless a school wants to take that leap, the MWC might be limited to the likes of UTEP and New Mexico State.  Which is...not great.
“True patriotism hates injustice in its own land more than anywhere else.” - Clarence Darrow

dgies9156

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 4078
Re: More conference realignment talk
« Reply #3581 on: September 13, 2024, 02:53:00 PM »
The ticking I'm hearing these days is the bomb planted underneath the foundation of the Atlantic Coast Conference.

When that thing goes off, it won't be pretty. They'll be blood everywhere as Clemson, North Carolina, Virginia, Notre Dame, Florida State and Miami head elsewhere. It's going to happen, sooner or later.

Stanford and Cal went from the Conference of Champions to the Conference of Also-Rans.

The ACC is a backwater weakling in football. It's premier programs, Clemson, Miami and Florida State generally suck. Most of the rest of the conference thinks a football is a warped or worn-out basketball.

Your move, losers!

Viper

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 2587
Re: More conference realignment talk
« Reply #3582 on: September 13, 2024, 08:20:50 PM »
The ticking I'm hearing these days is the bomb planted underneath the foundation of the Atlantic Coast Conference.

When that thing goes off, it won't be pretty. They'll be blood everywhere as Clemson, North Carolina, Virginia, Notre Dame, Florida State and Miami head elsewhere. It's going to happen, sooner or later.

Stanford and Cal went from the Conference of Champions to the Conference of Also-Rans.

The ACC is a backwater weakling in football. It's premier programs, Clemson, Miami and Florida State generally suck. Most of the rest of the conference thinks a football is a warped or worn-out basketball.

Your move, losers!
100%, brother Dgies. Cal and Stanford needed to stand pat for another year, SMU too, imo. They’ll probably end up in another year or two where they should have gone anyway.

The Hippie Satan of Hyperbole

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 12588
  • “Good lord, you are an idiot.” - real chili 83
Re: More conference realignment talk
« Reply #3583 on: September 13, 2024, 08:24:18 PM »
100%, brother Dgies. Cal and Stanford needed to stand pat for another year, SMU too, imo. They’ll probably end up in another year or two where they should have gone anyway.

They’re making significantly more money in the ACC than they would have been had they stayed in the PAC 12.
“True patriotism hates injustice in its own land more than anywhere else.” - Clarence Darrow

Plaque Lives Matter!

  • Starter
  • ***
  • Posts: 236
Re: More conference realignment talk
« Reply #3584 on: September 13, 2024, 11:19:20 PM »
Is St. Thomas too far east for the PAC-12

WeAreMarquette96

  • Scholarship Player
  • **
  • Posts: 91
Re: More conference realignment talk
« Reply #3585 on: September 14, 2024, 08:26:19 AM »
The other 3 make sense but Fresno St being added over other options confuses me. Candidate pool to get to 8-10-12 teams imo assuming they don’t add Midwest/East coast teams: Gonzaga (bball only), St Mary’s (bball only), UNLV, Utah State, Wyoming, Nevada, New Mexico, New Mexico St, Idaho, Idaho St, Montana, Montana St, North Dakota St, South Dakota St, San Jose St, Sacramento St, UC Davis, Texas State, UTSA, UTEP, Memphis, Tulane, Rice, Air Force, Hawaii
« Last Edit: September 14, 2024, 08:28:12 AM by WeAreMarquette96 »

Uncle Rico

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 10414
    • Mazos Hamburgers
Re: More conference realignment talk
« Reply #3586 on: September 14, 2024, 08:35:43 AM »
It would be a good landing spot for Nebraska
Ramsey head thoroughly up his ass.

muwarrior69

  • Registered User
  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 5206
Re: More conference realignment talk
« Reply #3587 on: September 14, 2024, 09:14:47 AM »
So, will the Pac whatever still have an auto bid for the tournament in 2027?
« Last Edit: September 14, 2024, 09:22:28 AM by muwarrior69 »

GoldenWarrior11

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 2080
Re: More conference realignment talk
« Reply #3588 on: September 14, 2024, 09:40:48 AM »
So, will the Pac whatever still have an auto bid for the tournament in 2027?

Need to get to 8 before then, but I don't think that'll be an issue.

IMO, Texas State and UTSA are probable next targets. If they say no, they can easily get UNLV and Nevada.  I think Texas is crucial for TV contract.

The Hippie Satan of Hyperbole

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 12588
  • “Good lord, you are an idiot.” - real chili 83
Re: More conference realignment talk
« Reply #3589 on: September 14, 2024, 11:02:31 AM »
The other 3 make sense but Fresno St being added over other options confuses me. Candidate pool to get to 8-10-12 teams imo assuming they don’t add Midwest/East coast teams: Gonzaga (bball only), St Mary’s (bball only), UNLV, Utah State, Wyoming, Nevada, New Mexico, New Mexico St, Idaho, Idaho St, Montana, Montana St, North Dakota St, South Dakota St, San Jose St, Sacramento St, UC Davis, Texas State, UTSA, UTEP, Memphis, Tulane, Rice, Air Force, Hawaii

Yeah a lot of these make little sense. Idaho State? UC Davis? There won’t be any FCS schools in consideration IMO.

Anyway Fresno State is a well supported program. Always good to have California teams from a recruiting perspective.
“True patriotism hates injustice in its own land more than anywhere else.” - Clarence Darrow

Billy Hoyle

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 2830
  • Retire #34
Re: More conference realignment talk
« Reply #3590 on: September 15, 2024, 10:01:01 AM »
Yeah a lot of these make little sense. Idaho State? UC Davis? There won’t be any FCS schools in consideration IMO.

Anyway Fresno State is a well supported program. Always good to have California teams from a recruiting perspective.

Idaho State and UC Davis wouldn't make sense for the Summit League, let alone the Pac-12. I guess this was the "look at a map and name schools I see" approach. I do find it laughable that Sac State is openly campaigning for Pac-12 membership. Yeah, that 1000 seat gym they can't sell out for hoops is going to be a selling point for a power conference. There is a better chance of Long Beach State bringing back football and joining the Pac 12 than there is Sac State getting an invite.

It also seems Pac leadership has been pretty transparent that football is a requirement for membership so that eliminates Gonzaga (SMC would be eliminated for several other reasons).  GU could now become a more attractive option for the MWC though. They will only take current FBS programs.
“You either smoke or you get smoked. And you got smoked.”

MU Fan in Connecticut

  • Registered User
  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 3492
Re: More conference realignment talk
« Reply #3591 on: September 17, 2024, 06:29:55 AM »
Peter Thamel reporting that it looks like Air Force is close to joining the AAC.

Billy Hoyle

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 2830
  • Retire #34
Re: More conference realignment talk
« Reply #3592 on: September 17, 2024, 07:52:44 AM »
Peter Thamel reporting that it looks like Air Force is close to joining the AAC.

they're a "target" but I don't know how "close" they are to joining. AAC is reportedly talking to UNLV as well.
“You either smoke or you get smoked. And you got smoked.”

Viper

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 2587
Re: More conference realignment talk
« Reply #3593 on: September 17, 2024, 07:56:46 AM »
Peter Thamel reporting that it looks like Air Force is close to joining the AAC.
possibly attractive to AF since Army & Navy are already AAC members?

The Hippie Satan of Hyperbole

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 12588
  • “Good lord, you are an idiot.” - real chili 83
Re: More conference realignment talk
« Reply #3594 on: September 17, 2024, 08:02:51 AM »
they're a "target" but I don't know how "close" they are to joining. AAC is reportedly talking to UNLV as well.

This feels like the AAC is doing the "best defense is a good offense" thing. Instead of the P12 doing the raiding, they are going to be proactive instead.

I get why Air Force would be interested in the AAC because it doesn't seem the P12 would be that interested. But UNLV?
“True patriotism hates injustice in its own land more than anywhere else.” - Clarence Darrow

Uncle Rico

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 10414
    • Mazos Hamburgers
Re: More conference realignment talk
« Reply #3595 on: September 17, 2024, 08:33:50 AM »
This feels like the AAC is doing the "best defense is a good offense" thing. Instead of the P12 doing the raiding, they are going to be proactive instead.

I get why Air Force would be interested in the AAC because it doesn't seem the P12 would be that interested. But UNLV?

I think there is a belief UNLV is getting serious about athletics.  It’s definitely not for TV.  Their viewership numbers are amongst the worst in the Mountain West.  If the argument is market, I don’t see that.
Ramsey head thoroughly up his ass.

Billy Hoyle

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 2830
  • Retire #34
Re: More conference realignment talk
« Reply #3596 on: September 17, 2024, 09:26:22 AM »
I think there is a belief UNLV is getting serious about athletics.  It’s definitely not for TV.  Their viewership numbers are amongst the worst in the Mountain West.  If the argument is market, I don’t see that.

UNLV doesn't draw. Football has been averaging under 20K a game the past two seasons and that average is usually bolstered by non-conference road fans coming in. Basketball has fallen off too. The past few seasons they have been below 6k. With pro sports throughout the college season now ,they just aren't a draw. The days of "Gucci Row" at UNLV games are long gone and not coming back.
« Last Edit: September 17, 2024, 11:29:16 AM by Billy Hoyle »
“You either smoke or you get smoked. And you got smoked.”

Uncle Rico

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 10414
    • Mazos Hamburgers
Re: More conference realignment talk
« Reply #3597 on: September 17, 2024, 09:41:48 AM »
UNLV doesn't draw. Football has been averaging under 20K a game the past two seasons and that average is usually bolstered by non-conference road fans coming in. Basketball has fallen off too. The past few seasons they have been below 6k. With pro sports throughout the college season now ,they just aren't a draw.

The idea of Vegas is probably appealing to TV people more than the reality of Vegas
Ramsey head thoroughly up his ass.