Main Menu
collapse

Recent Posts

Shaka Preseason Availability by MUbiz
[October 30, 2024, 10:45:57 PM]


Server Upgrade - This is the new server by #UnleashSean
[October 30, 2024, 10:40:54 PM]


Owens out Monday by PointWarrior
[October 30, 2024, 08:23:31 PM]


Mizzou Secret Scrimmage by MUfan12
[October 30, 2024, 03:20:06 PM]


Get to know Ben Steele by WhiteTrash
[October 30, 2024, 03:08:14 PM]


Deleted by The Lens
[October 30, 2024, 02:13:20 PM]


Kam Jones Named to NABC, Naismith Trophy POY Preseason Watch Lists by MarquetteMike1977
[October 30, 2024, 01:47:33 PM]

Please Register - It's FREE!

The absolute only thing required for this FREE registration is a valid e-mail address. We keep all your information confidential and will NEVER give or sell it to anyone else.
Login to get rid of this box (and ads) , or register NOW!


US (Ohio) Strain

Started by GooooMarquette, January 13, 2021, 09:49:57 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

GooooMarquette

Researchers at tOSU have identified a new strain of the virus that appears more transmissible than the original virus. It quickly became the dominant strain found in Columbus. Ugh....

https://www.cnbc.com/2021/01/13/ohio-researchers-say-theyve-identified-two-new-covid-strains-likely-originating-in-the-us.html

Frenns Liquor Depot

I've heard the spike protein mutated and now looks like this.


Galway Eagle

Just out of curiosity. It makes sense for a virus to mutate to be more transmissible but it doesn't quite make sense for it to mutate to be more deadly does it? I mean a virus needs a host to survive and thus shouldn't these strains be less deadly?
Maigh Eo for Sam

GooooMarquette

Quote from: Galway Eagle on January 13, 2021, 10:08:01 AM
Just out of curiosity. It makes sense for a virus to mutate to be more transmissible but it doesn't quite make sense for it to mutate to be more deadly does it? I mean a virus needs a host to survive and thus shouldn't these strains be less deadly?


Mutations are totally random. They occur as 'accidents,' and then survive (or not) based on whether or not they are still adapted to the environment.

Galway Eagle

Quote from: GooooMarquette on January 13, 2021, 12:34:36 PM

Mutations are totally random. They occur as 'accidents,' and then survive (or not) based on whether or not they are still adapted to the environment.

Of course I understand the concept that they're random. But wouldn't the natural selection of mutations be to keep the host alive? I mean if it mutates to be extremely deadly then the majority of those with that mutation will die with the host. Meanwhile if it mutates to be less deadly it will be passed more frequently and that mutation will thrive.

I don't claim to have an advanced understanding of biology just trying to apply basic logic
Maigh Eo for Sam

warriorchick

Quote from: Galway Eagle on January 13, 2021, 12:41:55 PM
Of course I understand the concept that they're random. But wouldn't the natural selection of mutations be to keep the host alive? I mean if it mutates to be extremely deadly then the majority of those with that mutation will die with the host. Meanwhile if it mutates to be less deadly it will be passed more frequently and that mutation will thrive.

I don't claim to have an advanced understanding of biology just trying to apply basic logic

I am no biologist either, but I would think that any virus that is both easily transmitted and extremely deadly doesn't need the host to survive for very long.  By the time the host dies, it will have likely passed successfully to several other new hosts.
Have some patience, FFS.

GooooMarquette

Quote from: Galway Eagle on January 13, 2021, 12:41:55 PM
Of course I understand the concept that they're random. But wouldn't the natural selection of mutations be to keep the host alive? I mean if it mutates to be extremely deadly then the majority of those with that mutation will die with the host. Meanwhile if it mutates to be less deadly it will be passed more frequently and that mutation will thrive.

I don't claim to have an advanced understanding of biology just trying to apply basic logic

Yes - if it mutates to be more deadly, it would stand to reason it would eventually run out of hosts. But that would be pretty far off since the virus seems also to be able to live in other species (bats, cats, perhaps others). And in the meantime, it could decimate us....

rocky_warrior

Quote from: Galway Eagle on January 13, 2021, 12:41:55 PM
Of course I understand the concept that they're random. But wouldn't the natural selection of mutations be to keep the host alive? I mean if it mutates to be extremely deadly then the majority of those with that mutation will die with the host. Meanwhile if it mutates to be less deadly it will be passed more frequently and that mutation will thrive.

I don't claim to have an advanced understanding of biology just trying to apply basic logic

I think that's the exact struggle with Covid.  It keeps the host alive for easily 3-4 weeks after being infected.  And for about 3 of those weeks the host will either think it's just a bad cold, or not even know they have the virus.

🏀

Quote from: Frenns Liquor Depot on January 13, 2021, 09:59:18 AM
I've heard the spike protein mutated and now looks like this.



Well done, sir! Well done!

MUBurrow

Quote from: warriorchick on January 13, 2021, 01:08:58 PM
I am no biologist either, but I would think that any virus that is both easily transmitted and extremely deadly doesn't need the host to survive for very long.  By the time the host dies, it will have likely passed successfully to several other new hosts.

Here's an interesting graph on this - https://www.vox.com/xpress/2014/10/17/6993851/diseases-deadly-infectious-reproduction-information-beautiful.  I think one of the points is that if you are going to be deadly, you've also got to be super contagious or you'll peter out.  MERS was a good example of that.