Goaltend or clean block

[Juan Anderson's Mixtape]

I don't know how the refs are instructed, but on a play like that it would be better to let the play go at least until a team has clear possession. Treat it like they do with fumbles in football. If not sure, they let the play go. If they determine there was no fumble they can always go back and reset the clock.

On this play because the whistle blew it isn't clear who would have grabbed the rebound.

Unfortunately, the rule requires the refs to call the goaltend in order to review it.  I don't think they can let play continue to see who gets the ball, then go to review.

Given the circumstances, I was glad to take MU's chances with a last shot/OT.

[StillAWarrior]

Marquette would have got possession. There was a jump ball under a minute that went to DEPaul. The arrow was pointed toward Marquette. When Kam threw the ball away to Jop at the end I was saying Kam should have just held it since Marquette would have got possession.

I'm not sure you're right about this. The TV definitely showed that DePaul had the possession arrow (I just went and checked). And there was no jump ball under a minute that went to DePaul (checked that too). After MU inbounded to start the second half, I don't think that there was ever a time that the possession arrow on TV wasn't with DePaul. I can't say with certainty that TV had it right...but I don't specifically recall a jump ball in the second half. There was one in the first half (5:31).

[BrewCity83]

MMike1977 may have been five Miller Lites in...

[MarquetteMike1977]

MMike1977 may have been five Miller Lites in...

Lol 2 Miller Lites per game limit

[mug644]

Right in front of me and I thought in real time it was not off of Ben and that they might go to the tape for purposes of the clock. 

But: 

1. Refs were a joke- just looking at each other- two did not want to review; the one closest to Holt was getting an earful and wanted to review; I think they finally decided that they could all agree on a clock review (which then would enable them to overturn the out of bounds ruling).

2. I was more worried in real time (they couldn't make this call on review) that they were going to call Ben for a foul- he was incredibly physical and basically forced the DP guy to go out.  Strong play, but right on the edge.

I wouldn't say the refs were a joke, but they did miss a call that, on replay, they clearly missed. Stevie's drive and elbow into the defender when he missed the shot but got his own rebound and scored. I've not see others comment on it, but it seemed to be a clear foul on Stevie. Huge play that went our way; so, I thought the refs were perfect (especially as both the goaltending and out of bounds calls involving Gold worked in our favor).

[Newsdreams]

Lol 2 Miller Lites per game limit

Very weak, Travis wouldn't approve

[MarquetteMike1977]

I'm not sure you're right about this. The TV definitely showed that DePaul had the possession arrow (I just went and checked). And there was no jump ball under a minute that went to DePaul (checked that too). After MU inbounded to start the second half, I don't think that there was ever a time that the possession arrow on TV wasn't with DePaul. I can't say with certainty that TV had it right...but I don't specifically recall a jump ball in the second half. There was one in the first half (5:31).

Stand corrected again. You are correct was talking about overtime. There was a jump ball with 15.7 seconds in overtime. Was saying Kam should have held on to the ball with 9.5 seconds left in overtime when it went out of bounds on his pass to Jop since Marquette had the arrow. But again spoke with Kam's Dad and David's Mom at the game they are the best families and players.